Tetric EvoFlow

Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

Claim 1: As initial layer under Class I to V restorations
Claim 2: Anterior restorations (Class III)
Claim 3: Anterior restorations (Class IV)
Claim 4: Class V restorations (cervical caries, root erosion, wedge-shaped defects)
Claim 5: Small restorations of all types
Claim 6: Extended fissure sealing
Claim 7: Splinting of mobile teeth
Claim 8: Blocking out of undercuts
Claim 9: Adhesive cementation of light-transmissive indirect composite and ceramic restorations
Claim 10: Repair of composite/ceramic veneers

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)

CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0

none found

none found

Claim 6:
Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57.

Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):468-73.

Claims 1 - 5 and 7 - 10:

none found